Date Received: 2020-02-08
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Subissue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Consumer Complaint: Ive notified LexisNexis on several occasions that they were reporting incorrect information on my credit report, I also froze my LexisNexis files and they continue to share my data with the credit bureaus. I sent them letters from the bankruptcy court stating they do not give this information to them. Yet they state this is where they got it from. They are reporting incorrect information and have not legally verified my information its been pass 30 days for them to validate this information ... I have not received anything from them.
Company Response:
State: IL
Zip: 60634
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-08
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-04
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Public record information inaccurate
Consumer Complaint: Notice to whom it be of concern, It is YOU I hold accountable and accuse of complicity in exercise of malevolent did-compliance. I hereby mark you as likely one that I might one day view in civil discord as the " would be plaintiffs '', yet I declare to you your unjust claim is to be met with deliberate and determined resistance and counteraction. In is in clarity that your Claim of Non-Medical debt Collection is insufficient for collections much less reporting. You MUST DELETE this unjust injurious allegation because it is significantly deficient of the requisite certified reporting compliance ( such as perfect metro 2 format reporting ) and testimonial evidence of the PHYSICALY VERIFIABLE PROOF OF VALIDATION as related to the full truth, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, ownership, identity of true debtor, dates, balances, audits, calculations, source codes, creditor collection code, 426-chrc P6 statement and its associated trailing fragments, the minimal five portioned personal identifiers, the pay statuses, the required 386-pieces of confirmation to collection, and elsewise standard or mandatory for proper reporting, mentioned or not. Although I am checking for and addressing missing and or deficient aspects of REPORTING COMPLIANCES and not contesting any debt of compliant nature, I should make you aware that since unlawful reporting transitions collection into an equally not complaint circumstance. Being still yet not validated by document fact in compliance to requisite standards, it is to be announced yet again that legally I have no knowledge of the validity of the alleged claims of delinquency and or derogatory nature, nor of the certifiably compliant matter to either any of its collection attempts and or its reporting despite previous consumer filed composed complaints checking for each. Might it be known, especially shall I elect to take this matter up to a civil court, any debt and or derogatory claim must be pursued ( particularly for collection ) in a very defined and precisely compliant and physically verifiable or certifiable manner as detailed in the requisite obeyed federal and state collection and reporting regulations associated with any of the above noted said claim ( s ) to include but not limited to the FCBA, FCRA, HIPAA PRIVACY RULE, FACTA, FDCPA and TCPA, etc. ADDITIONALLY, if an entity acts as a collector and also elects to act as a reporting party of consumer credit they must as well adhere to every single one even each any and all of the regulatory reporting requisites and standards of reporting with legal standing in full accordance of laws and accepted reporting standards. To date, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any capacity or willingness to validate the alleged debt much less certify the fair, accurate, complete and compliant reporting of the claims, particularly being significantly deficient is any display of certified metro 2 compliance. As such, given the fact of recent breaches of information collection repositories, I am hesitating to readily accept what is presented without testimonial and certified physically verifiable document evidence of claim as being legitimate. I deny nothing, yet I reserve the right to question any unproven claim. I do NOT accept the statement of claim of the plaintiff and I call for the court to reject their claim as untrue, unverified, incomplete, not compliant or otherwise invalid and thereby reject-able and dischargeable which requirement to be dismissed in full. I demand said court resolution today, even here and now in full accords of regulatory statutes, mentioned by me or not. 1 ) To date, I have received no knowledge of ever entering into any contractual relationship with the to-be plaintiff ( s ) { should I forward into a civil complaint } or with the entity ( ies ) that allegedly issued against me the defaulted line of credit ( s ) or accusations similar. This despite repeated calls to the accusers to demonstrate the requisite presented physically verifiable document proof of adequately acquired permissible purpose from the exactly and only individual irrefutably identified as being me. I have no acknowledgement of a relationship with the parties mentioned, in any form. 2 ) I have no knowledge of ever knowingly acknowledging ( or even unknowingly doing so ) that I owe any proven and compliantly reported debt, much less the claim of unproven debt alleged in this written declaration CHECKING for not only VALIDITY of CLAIMS but also DOCUMENT PROOF IN CERTIFIABLE TESTIMONY as to the factual and complete COMPLIANCE to all standards and laws, even the mandatory Metro 2 Format Compliance. Its obvious that the allegations filed by the accusers ( or to-be plaintiff ) are in clear subterfuge of act, be it in willful disregard of ethical practices or be it done so in ignorance of requisite ethical and regulatory compliant behavior during their accusations, collection efforts and credit reporting of claims. The vile nature of their derelict is unjustly injurious and unlawful no doubt. I again call for a dismissal of to-be plaintiffs statement of claim ( s ) and discharge of misreported delinquencies and derogatory behavior that the accusers complaint is undeniably unfairly lodged versus me. 3 ) I have no knowledge of ever receiving any proven or document facts in statement of account or account aspects for these items of alleged debt and delinquent actions. Again, I reiterate I have called on the accusers to present to be document certifiably true, correct, complete, and adequately compliant documentation in full validation of claims, rights to collect alleged claims, and rights to report alleged claims. Let it be true that COMPLIANCE of regulatory requisites is MANDATORY not OPTIONAL. Plaintiffs claims are mute of legal standing in full accordance of law and must be dismissed. 4 ) I have no knowledge of ever entering into an open account with to-be Plaintiff ( s ) or with the entity ( ies ) that allegedly issued me the defaulted line of credit ( s ) or derogatory claims of credit. 5 ) FACT IS, no claim above has even submitted adequate compliant proof of the genesis of any consumer/creditor relationship and their inability to prove application, permissible purpose for said alleged application, consumer/creditor agreement in contract describing a relationship related to alleged claim of account and or debt ( s ), and or otherwise derelict documentation of claim ( s ) inherently makes invalid the to-be Plaintiffs whole statement of claim in this summons or complaint. I request court to resolve adequately and compliantly as required with the immediate eradication of complaint charge ( s ) and rectification of any injurious collection or reporting practices. Again, COMPLIANCE of APPROPRIATE COLLECTION PRACTICES and equally COMPLIANCE of APPROPRIATE and COMPLETE REPORTING PRACTICES is MANDATORY, NOT OPTIONAL. 6 ) As it stands, until PROVEN OTHERWISE, the complaining to-be Plaintiff ( s ) does so unjustly, unethically, and likely illegally so in absolute deficiency of requisite legal standing in full accordance of applicable laws ( mentioned or not ), both to collection practices and as well with reporting practices, particularly in the inability or unwillingness to timely and fully certify physically verifiable document proof in full validity of debt claim or compliance of reporting, even to the mandatory Metro 2 format. As such, here again I declare my right and preference to stand against all claims of the to-be Plaintiff ( s ) and call on your authority and INTEGRITY to ensure truth of claim, correctness of claim, completeness of claim, ownership and responsibility of any debt ( s ) or delinquencies of debt alleged in above noted claim ( s ), perfect and prove-able compliance of collection actions related to claim ( s ), and compliance of reporting actions related to claim ( s ) ... ... ... ... ... ... ..
Company Response:
State: PA
Zip: 19120
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-04
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-04
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Subissue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Consumer Complaint: I applied for a new phone with XXXX. They came back and said that I had a low credit score and I would have to pay more. I received a letter from XXXX with an explanation. They got their information from Lexis/Nexus. Lexis/Nexis score was XXXX. All other reporting agencies are above 800. I sent Lexis/Nexis a letter asking for documentation. They sent me a letter saying they could not find any information on me ... even assigned me a case # XXXX. ( XXXX used my name and SS # which they gave to Lexis.Nexis and they were able to give XXXX back a very low score. ) I gave them all the information they needed. No reply. I went online and asked for my credit report from Lexis/Nexis and gave them the information again. Just received a letter asking for the same information again. They assigned me another case number # XXXX. Hence, my request to you. They are simply avoiding the issue. And it is apparent that they do not want to provide me with any information about this problem.
Company Response:
State: UT
Zip: 847XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-05
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-04
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Information belongs to someone else
Consumer Complaint: I have been checking my credit for accuracy and found account in my credit profile that I did not authorize, I think they are fraudulent, a list of these account are contained in this report.
Company Response:
State: GA
Zip: 30096
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-04
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-04
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Subissue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report
Consumer Complaint: LexisNexis is reporting a public record that allegedly belongs to me. When I requested my file, I noticed the the reference number was tied to a social security number that was not mine. I asked LexisNexis to verify and they stated that they did. I then requested the method of verification and they sent records of what was in my file but not how it was verified. I sent a letter from the courts stating that LexisNexis had not verified any such public record with them nor started any motions to obtain such records. This public record remains in tact due to a third party verification and I'm not sure what exactly they looked at because when I used the same method they used to " verify '' my search yielded no results for my full name and the last 4 of my social. Providing LexisNexis with the PACER results and a letter from the courts was still not enough to correct the error on my file. The public record still remains, and my consumer rights to request information have been violated continuously by this organization.
Company Response:
State: MO
Zip: 633XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-04
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-03
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Public record information inaccurate
Consumer Complaint: LexisNexis is reporting the following items inaccurately ( see enclosed ). This violates the FCRA.
Company Response:
State: IL
Zip: 60133
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-03
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-02
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Information belongs to someone else
Consumer Complaint: I am contacting you about the compromising of my social security number. I am a victim of Identity Theft. I contacted the Federal Trade Commission and filed a complaint # and contacted the police department and obtained a police report # which both are attached. Please block and remove all information from my credit report, and send me an updated copy of my credit report. The following items do not belong to me and is a result of fraud that I did not authorize :
Company Response:
State: GA
Zip: 30078
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-02
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-02
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Public record information inaccurate
Consumer Complaint: A bankruptcy that I did not do remains on my report even though no verification has been released or given. This is inaccurate and not within my rights.
Company Response:
State: GA
Zip: 30102
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-05
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-01
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Information belongs to someone else
Consumer Complaint: I AM REQUESTING A SECURITY FREEZE ALONG WITH BLOCK ON ALL ACCOUNTS. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX US DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Credit Card XXXX INQUIRES : XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX
Company Response:
State: GA
Zip: 30122
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2020-02-01
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Personal information incorrect
Consumer Complaint: I would like to request a security freeze placed on my Consumer Disclosure Report. I choose to opt-out of your disclosing future information until further notice including the XXXX . Report and other furnished Lexis Nexis, XXXX XXXX, XXXX inquires regarding all personal information. This security freeze request not only restricts credit bureaus and creditors, but also future potential employers until I lift this restriction. Under the Fair Report Act, you are required to comply. My name is XXXX XXXX. My current and only address is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Ohio XXXX I have unknown or fraudulent addresses appearing on my credit report and I am requesting that these items be removed and updated. Please remove the following addresses : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX CT, XXXX XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Please remove the following Telephone Numbers : ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX
Company Response:
State: OH
Zip: 43055
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2020-02-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A