Date Received: 2023-04-22
Issue: Improper use of your report
Subissue: Reporting company used your report improperly
Consumer Complaint: I have 3 bankruptcies on my credit report and over 115 inquiries on each report due to identify theft. XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX LexisNexis and l i, i did not disclose any personal information to these companies for any reason, nor did the bankruptcy court or my attorney. We sent letters of expungement from the courts on XX/XX/2023 for them to be taken of my credit report all companies have failed to do so. They are violating my rights as a consumer, And under FCRA. Can you someone please reach out to these companies XXXX XXXX LexisNexis XXXX XXXX And have them to remove all 3 bankruptcies off of my credit report XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response:
State: IL
Zip: 60610
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-22
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-23
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Subissue: Was not notified of investigation status or results
Consumer Complaint: DISPUTE NOTICE I've attempted to resolve this with LEXISNEXIS multiple times. LEXISNEXIS has done nothing except delay. They had previously said that the accounts had been authenticated. I am once again demanding that LEXISNEXIS provide me with paperwork confirming that I am LEGALLY OBLIGATED to pay this alleged debt. Many times, LEXISNEXIS has obtained identification information. Please keep in mind that this is creating financial hardship. Failure to respond in a proper and lawful manner will result in further legal action. Failure to respond within 14 calendar days will be seen as your acceptance of the debt 's illegitimacy. Please confirm and provide evidence that I am " LEGALLY OBLIGATED '' to fulfill these ostensible commitments. " HAVE BEEN VERIFIED '' is a simple response. Respectfully delete the following immediately : 1 ) XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) 2 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXXXXXX ) 3 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 4 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX XXXXXXXX ) 5 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 6 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 7 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXXXXXX ) 8 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX 9 ) XXXX XXXX 10 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX 11 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX .
Company Response:
State: PA
Zip: 185XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-23
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-23
Issue: Improper use of your report
Subissue: Reporting company used your report improperly
Consumer Complaint: So I requested a consumer disclosure report from LexisNexis. I then received a letter from LexisNexis with a code that I should utilize when trying to retrieve my consumer disclosure report which will expire in 30 days. After several attempts not being able to log in. I reached out to LexisNexis regarding this with no response! Are they refusing to provide the necessary information to retrieve my report. Also it has come to my attention that LexisNexis automatically sells your information to XXXX, XXXX AND XXXX. How is this possible without my permission?
Company Response:
State: IL
Zip: 60532
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-23
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-22
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Personal information incorrect
Consumer Complaint: On XX/XX/2023 Lexis Nexis was sent a letter notifying them of inaccurate personal information on my lexisnexis report. The Public Records information as stated on the report as well need to be removed as well. I have a letter from the courts that states they did not provide this information. Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response:
State: GA
Zip: 30281
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-22
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-22
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Public record information inaccurate
Consumer Complaint: I asked LexisNexis to verify the information they're reporting on my report. On XX/XX/2023 I received a letter saying everything was verified. I still found inaccuracies between the public record information and the information they're reporting. They're reporting incorrect information and claiming that it is accurate.
Company Response:
State: ID
Zip: XXXXX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-22
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-21
Issue: Improper use of your report
Subissue: Reporting company used your report improperly
Consumer Complaint: I'm making this complaint to LEXISNEXIS. I wrote to them about the errors in my report, including dates of last activity, dates opened, dates reported, and payment status, among other things. They claimed to have conducted a thorough investigation, despite the fact that it took them more than 30 days to finish it. However, when I reviewed my report, I found that nothing had changed. The false information is still being reported. Numerous times, my rights have been violated. According to 15 U.S.C. 1681, section 602 A, I have the right to privacy. Section 2 of 15 U.S.C. 1681, Section 604 A. It also says that a consumer reporting agency can't give me an account unless I tell them in writing.
Company Response:
State: CA
Zip: 91307
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-21
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Account information incorrect
Consumer Complaint: I. BACKGROUND Over the last five ( 5 ) years I, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Consumer and/or Plaintiff ), have been DENIED access to extended credit opportunities via Credit Cards , Lines of Credit for my Businesses , and even been denied employment and professional advancement opportunities because of the numerous, egregious, fraudulent, unauthenticated, and negligently reported INACCURATED, AGED, DUPLICATE ACCOUNTS, and/or NOT MINE but are still being negatively reported on my credit file. These negative reports has caused me irreparable harm, emotional harm and distress, damages, loss of income and loss of employment opportunities via my inability to have my Secret level security clearance restored because of the fraudulently perceived Bad Credit image that has been falsely stained my character by XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, LEXISNEXIS, XXXX XXXXXXXX, and other Credit Reporting Agencies ( individually and/or collectively the CRA and/or Defendant and Disputed Account Holders ), all in clear violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. and the Maryland Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Annotated Code of Maryland, Commercial Law Article, 14-1201, et seq. I recently applied for a Commercial Realestate Loan for a property that I was looking to purchase for my business and potentially build a primary homesite for me and my family in my hometown of XXXX XXXX, GA. HOWEVER, I have been DENIED the extension of credit by the lending institution because XXXX XXXX ) reported by Credit Score to them at a XXXX rating ; and 2 ) have negatively and falsely reported me having over 229 instances of DELINQUENCIES and/or LATE PAYMENTS over 90 days, which is wholly INACCURATE and mathematically IMPOSSIBLE!!!! See Exhibits A & B. Ive constantly disputed the accuracy of the information in my credit file over the last 5 years. After reviewing my credit report, I am writing to dispute the following inaccurate information. I am listing each item along with the way it should be IMMEDIATELY corrected as follows : II. HISTORY OF CONSUMERS EDUCATION / STUDENT LOANS BEING INITIATED, SERVICED, SOLD, AND RESOLD BY XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ), XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) LOAN SERVICING COMPANIES CAUSING IRREPARABLE HARM TO CONSUMER I graduated from XXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX with my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I then graduated from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX with my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX again, with ZERO Student Loan debt because I had a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I began my XXXX XXXX XXXX part-time in XX/XX/XXXX. According to my XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Account printout by Term, I ONLY OWE A TOTAL OF {$98000.00} in total Student Loan Debt and ALL of it has been at XXXXXXXX XXXX for my XXXX XXXX XXXX When I secured my initial student loans through XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) was the initial loan servicer for my student loans on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education. Then after about two years, my student loans were SOLD/ TRANSFERRED from XXXX to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as the new owner and/or Servicer of the student loans. This is documented via Exhibit A, Pages 6 10, for all of the following student loan accounts : XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$3400.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$8500.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$12000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$9300.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$10000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$8500.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$20000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - US DEPARTMENT OF EDU XXXX Account Number XXXX - {$10000.00} The collective loan amounts borrowed from XXXX, which were eventually transferred to XXXX, totals {$82000.00} which is directly consistent with the student loan amounts shown on my XXXXXXXX XXXX Account Summary by Term, enclosed as Exhibit C. Beginning around fiscal year XXXX or so, my student loans were again SOLD/ TRANSFERRED from XXXX as the owner and/or loan servicer over to XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX who is now the current loan servicer for my student loans on the behalf of the U.S. Department of Education XXXX HOWER, when my student loans were received by XXXX they ASSIGNED NEW ACCOUNT NUMBERS TO MY LOANS WHICH CREATED NEW AND DUPLICATE INSTALLMENT ACCOUNTS TO SHOW UP ON MY CREDIT PROFILE!!! This is documented via Exhibit A, Pages 10 13, for all of the following student loan accounts : XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$20000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$8500.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$9300.00} XXXX XXXX # XXXX - DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$8500.00} XXXX ) # XXXX XXXX DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXXXXXX Account XXXX - {$3400.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$12000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXXXXXX Account XXXX - {$10000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXXXXXX Account XXXX - {$10000.00} The collective loan value of these student loan installment accounts owned and/or serviced by XXXX totals {$82000.00} which again is the EXACT TOTAL for the SAME eight ( 8 ) installment accounts as listed above that were transferred over to them from XXXX and XXXX!!! Additionally both XXXX and XXXX still continued to negligently report the same accounts which they previously SOLD to XXXX on my credit profile which has now created DUPLICATE ACCOUNTS for the EXACT SAME STUDENT LOAN ACCOUNTS which has surely injured and caused irreparable harm to the consumer for the last 10 years at a minimum and continuing to date. Lastly, in XX/XX/XXXX I took advantage of the COVID-19 offer by the U.S. Department of Education to both 1 ) Consolidate my current Student Loans ; and 2 ) to have all of my student loan Payments deferred until AFTER the worldwide pandemic and National Emergency had been lifted by Congress via the CARES Act. As such, I consolidated ALL of my student loan debt directly with the DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION as the owner and creditor of my new CONSOLIDATED student loans. XXXX is still the current Loan Servicer of my student loans on the behalf of the U.S. Department of Education. See Exhibits J & K. This is documented via Exhibit A, Page 5, for all the following student loan accounts which initially appeared on my credit profile on XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$61000.00} XXXX ) # XXXX - DEPT OF EDXXXX XXXX Account XXXX - {$110000.00} The collective loan value of these newly CONSOLIDATED student loan installment accounts now owned EXCLUSIVELY by the U.S. Department of Education, and now serviced by XXXX totals {$170000.00} which again appears to be inclusive of the U.S. Department of Education FRAUDULENTLY PAY FOR THE VALUE OF MY STUDENT LOANS THREE ( 3 ) TIMES TO EACH OF THE XXXX, XXXX, AND XXXX XXXX XXXX SERVICERS !!! ! As such, the Federal Government has already PAID IN FULL and CLOSED all of the SAME 16 student loan installment accounts as listed above that were transferred over to the Federal government from XXXX, XXXX and XXXX!!! UNFORTUNATELY, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX all still continued to negligently, inaccurately, and egregiously report the same accounts which they previously SOLD back to the Department of Education on my credit profile which has now created at total of 16 INACCURATE and DUPLICATE ACCOUNTS for the EXACT SAME STUDENT LOAN ACCOUNTS which has surely injured and caused irreparable harm to the consumer for the last 10 years at a minimum and continuing to date, which clearly violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), 15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. and the Maryland Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Annotated Code of Maryland, Commercial Law Article, 14-1201, et seq., and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act ( MCPA ), Md. Code ( 2013 Repl. Vol., 2017 Supp. ), 13-101 et seq. of the Commercial Law Article ( C.L. ).
Company Response:
State: MD
Zip: 20721
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-21
Issue: Improper use of your report
Subissue: Reporting company used your report improperly
Consumer Complaint: XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX been supplying XXXX Nexus, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX with harmful and negative information on me for over three years. These event are choosing me to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX est. There has to be a clear reason that companies are attacking single minority women to the point that they weather me XXXX instead of just following guidelines with the FDCPA and the IRS the CONSUMER. Please help inn this matter because I being attacked. There are several CHARGE OFFS and enough is enough I need the title to my XXXX XXXX please.
Company Response:
State: TX
Zip: 77493
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-21
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Information belongs to someone else
Consumer Complaint: Lexis Nexis continues to violate my consumer right with fair accurate reporting. They also listed another persons ssn, account numbers and account information, outdated information, information not belonging to me, information pass the statute of limitations and fraudulent accounts. I spoke with a supervisor on several occasions with no resolve from XX/XX/2022 until XX/XX/2022.
Company Response:
State: MS
Zip: 39305
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-04-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A
Date Received: 2023-04-21
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Subissue: Information belongs to someone else
Consumer Complaint: Lexis Nexis continues to violate my consumer right with fair accurate reporting. They also listed another persons ssn, account numbers and account information, outdated information, information not belonging to me, information pass the statute of limitations and fraudulent accounts. I spoke with a supervisor on several occasions with no resolve from XX/XX/2022 until XX/XX/2022.
Company Response:
State: MS
Zip: 39305
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2023-05-25
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: N/A